CPC clinicopathological conference 043 Angiolymphoid hyperplasia with eosinophilia.
|
Accession number;06A0081423
|
| Title;CPC clinicopathological conference 043 Angiolymphoid hyperplasia with eosinophilia. |
| Author;
KIRYU YOSHIMARO
(Fukuokahifubyorishindanken)
|
Journal Title;Vis Dermatol
|
Journal Code:L5212A
|
ISSN:
|
|
VOL.5;NO.2;PAGE.180-183(2006)
|
| Figure&Table&Reference;FIG.5, TBL.1 |
| Pub. Country;Japan |
| Language;Japanese |
| Abstract;The case was in a 20-year-old woman, about 2 years ago, pimple-like papule appeared in the thorax, and brown color was shown, while growing gradually. It accompanied slight itching and spontaneous pain. There was no medical history of trauma, insect bite or infection at the position. Clinically, it is single or convergent papule or protuberant nodal lesion often generated in the craniocervical region of the juvenile, the mobility with the bottom floor is comparatively good in most cases, and the color is vaious from usual color to red. Histologically, blood vessels with thick walls grow with the background of inflammatory cell invasion of various densities consisting from lymphocytes and eosinophiles, and in the lesion in the depth, lymph follicle-like structure is observed in the interstitial tissue, though not often. Kimura Disease is fairly different from Angiolymphoid hyperplasia with eosinophilia (ALHE) clinically, and the feature is that a large subcutaneous node with scarce mobility is generated in the cheek and jaw, mainly in the middle age. There is no blood vessels with thick walls or intravascullsr protrusion of swelled endothelial cells, which appear in ALHE. Also, the fibrillatin of interstitial tissue is caused easily. Between ALHE and Kimura disease, clinical features and countermeasures are different in most cases, and since they can be differentiated histologically, they should be considered separately. |
|
|
|
Related Articles;
|
|
